Hello from rad.usuhs.edu Located at Table is card and pk = 6828 Result =
Invasive Lobular Carcinoma, MedPix : 6828 - Medical Image Database and Atlas
Welcome! It's Monday, November 24, 2014 :: :: :: RSS COW feed ::
| | | | | | | Publish | | | :: compass
Look for - || ||
Open-Close Option Buttons

New Topic

Location and Category

More Like This ? Breast and Mammography
none selected
More Like This ? Neoplasm, malignant (NOS)
Click for Similar Topics: Click on the Location, Sublocation, or Category Links - (above)

TOPIC and DISCUSSION :: Slide Sorter - Image Thumbnails :: Print Topic ::

More Like This ? Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
Topic 6828 - Created: 2005-11-03 09:11:35-05 - Modified: 2005-11-07 13:48:52.333816-05

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast is the second most common type of primary breast cancer, accounting for 10-15% of cases. 6-28% of cases are bilateral, approximately twice the risk of invasive ductal carcinoma.

Risk factors for breast cancer include:
• Age > 50
• Genetics (BRCA1, BRCA2, HER2, p53)
• Personal history of breast cancer
• Family history, especially in first-degree relative
• Previous breast biopsy showing benign conditions (e.g. LCIS or atypical hyperplasia)
• Menarche before age 12 or menopause after age 55
• Delayed childbirth after age 30
• Alcohol
• High-fat diet
• Obesity (weight gained as adult)
• Previous radiation therapy, e.g. tx Hodgkins’ disease
• Combined estrogen and progesterone replacement therapy (CHRT)

It has been historically difficult to diagnose early due to lack of pathomnemonic radiographic signs. Classically, ILC exhibits the ‘Indian file’ appearance of small, regular non-cohesive cells arranged in single files. The subtle mammographic findings are often due to malignant cells permeating the parenchyma around normal ducts, inducing little connective tissue reaction.

Physical exam may also be non-specific in ILC and may include vague areas of thickening which may be confused with benign breast change, especially in the younger patient.

US and MR imaging has been shown to be more sensitive than mammography for invasive cancer, but with the risk of overestimating the extent of the tumor. Combined mammography, clinical exam, and MRI were more sensitive at detecting ILC than any other individual test or combination of tests.

The majority of ILCs are of intermediate histological grade (grade 2) and ER+; prognosis is similar to that of invasive ductal carcinomas of similar grade.

• micro-calcification less frequently observed (6.5-25%) unlike in ductal ca
• speculated mass
• asymmetric density without definable margins
• architectural distortion without an obvious mass
• better demonstrated on craniocaudal view
Because these subtle findings are often confused with normal glandular tissue, the relative infrequency of micro-calicification, and the insidious growth of the tumor, ILC is often undetected until clinically palpable. At this stage, skin tethering, skin thickening, and nipple retraction are often apparent.

• useful adjunct to mammography
• ill-definied hypoechoic mass with acoustic attenuation
• FNA often do not yield much information due to the relative sparseness of malignancy cells within these tumors
• wide-bore needle biopsy should be performed if FNAs inconclusive

Contrast-enhanced MRI:
• highly sensitive in detecting ILC and the extent of ILC
• may be of value in preoperative planning as well as the diagnosis of multifocal or contralateral involvement

American College of Radiology (ACR) / Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)
BI-RADS Assessment Categories:
Category 0: Need Additional Imaging Evaluation
Category 1: Negative
Category 2: Benign Finding
Category 3: Probably Benign Finding - Short Interval Follow-Up Suggested
Category 4: Suspicious Abnormality - Biopsy Should Be Considered
Category 5: Highly Suggestive of Malignancy - Appropriate Action Should Be Taken

Gastrointestinal, gynecological, peritoneal, retroperitoneal, bone marrow, and leoptomeningeal metastases are more frequently seen with ILC than with IDC. CT, MRI, and PET scans are useful, but somewhat limited in revealing the full extent of metastatic ILC. Knowledge of pattern of metastasis is useful for interpretation of these imaging studies.

• Bone (most frequent metastasis site)
• Gastrointestinal –
o Esophagus, stomach (produces linitis plastica), small bowel (50% of mets) and large bowel wall thickening
o Can present as obstruction, hemorrhage, or performation
• Gynecologic –
o Uterus – ILC is most common extragenital neoplasm to metastasize to uterus
o Ovary, Vagina, Parametrium
• Genitourinary system – Direct invation of kidneys and ureters
• Peritoneum – Manifests as small nodules which may become confluent
• Retroperitoneum – Ureteric obstruction and hydronephrosis
• Leptomeninges
• Orbital metastases

Contributor Credits

Topic Submitted by: Eva Chou - Author Info
Affiliation: Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Topic approved by: Julian Paul Kassner - Editor Info
Affiliation: National Naval Medical Center Bethesda

MedPix® is a Registered Trademark of USUHS
The MedPix Database Engine is Patented - USPTO No. 7,080,098
Portions of MedPix are Copyright © 1999 - 2014 by J.G. Smirniotopoulos, M.D. & H. Irvine, M.D.
The MedPix Classification Schema Copyright © 1999 - 2014 by J.G.Smirniotopoulos,M.D.
MedPix has displayed more than   1,166,204,712   pages since 3 September 2000.

master.php3 :: find me

- Case Tools | | - More Options
... Google Analytics Active ...