Table is card and pk = 4323 Result =
Submode=
vesicoureteral reflux, MedPix™ : 4323 - Medical Image Database and Atlas
Welcome! It's Thursday, September 02, 2010 :: :: :: RSS Link

Location and Category

Location:
More Like This ? Genitourinary
Sublocation:
More Like This ? Ureter
Category:
More Like This ? Congenital, malformation
Find Related Topics: Click on the Location, Sublocation, or Category Links - (above)

TOPIC and DISCUSSION :: Slide Sorter :: Print Topic :: Slide Sorter ::

More Like This ? vesicoureteral reflux
Topic 4323 - Created: 2002-11-15 10:48:43-05 - Modified: 2004-06-09 22:55:30-04
ACR Index: 8.1

The true incidence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is unknown, but it is thought to be less than 1%. There are two distinct groups of patients who present with VUR: 1) patients who are discovered to have VUR in the course of a workup of a febrile UTI, who tend to be more often be girls than boys; and 2) patients with antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis, who tend to be more often be boys than girls. The incidence of VUR in those groups are 30-40% and 10%, respectively. There is a genetic predisposition to having VUR, with the sibling concordance being 30-50%.1

There are two kinds of VUR: primary and secondary. The primary VUR is due to an anatomic abnormality of the vesicoureteral junction. Normally, the ureter inserts into the wall of the bladder in a slanted fashion, with the musculature around the insertion functioning more or less like a valve. In primary VUR, the ureter inserts in a more horizontal fashion, with the “valve” now dysfunctional due to the abnormal insertion. Secondary VUR is caused by primary bladder pathology or dysfunction (such as cystitis or neurogenic bladder).(1)

VUR is graded (radiologically) as follows(1):
Grade 1: the contrast only refluxes into a normal caliber ureter.
Grade 2: the contrast fills an undilated ureter and the pyelocalyceal system, forming a cast of the normal collecting system.
Grade 3: the contrast shows mild dilation of the ureter and the pelvis. The sharp angles on the fornix of the calyx are blunted.
Grade 4: the contrast shows moderate dilation of the ureter and pelvis, and the calyceal anatomy is distorted sufficiently to provide only a papillary impression.
Grade 5: the contrast reveals severe dilation and tortuosity of the ureter, severe dilation of the pelvis, and clubbed calyces with no papillary impression.

Grading of an isotope cystogram ( by attempting to use the radiological criteria) is often inaccurate. It is probably best to simply describe the pattern observed on the images.

The principal management consists of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infection and possible scarring. Note that sterile reflux in and of itself does not cause scarring. Surgical treatment of VUR is sometimes indicated.(2)

Contributor Credits

Submitted by: Pil Kang - Author Info
Affiliation: Uniformed Services University
Approved By: Frank Schraml - Editor Info
Affiliation: National Naval Medical Center Bethesda


Text and Images may be Copyrighted © 1999 - 2009 by the Original Content Contributors.
Copyrighted materials are reproduced here with their Permission.

MedPix® is a Registered Trademark of USUHS :: The MedPix™ Database Engine is Patented - USPTO No. 7,080,098
Portions of MedPix™ are Copyright © 1999 - 2009 by J.G. Smirniotopoulos, M.D. & H. Irvine, M.D.
The MedPix™ Classification Schema Copyright © 1999 - 2009 by J.G.Smirniotopoulos,M.D.
MedPix™ has displayed more than   324,643,708   pages since 3 September 2000.
... Google Analytics Active ...