38.107.191.112
MedPix® Medical Image DatabaseDisease Topic 4711
(Reviewed and Approved) :: Link to this Topic
Click Here for MedPix®-2
» » - - Print Topic - - « «
Contributor: Michael P. Szczepanski, 2LT
Scroll to Bottom to Display Images (if available)
More Like This ? Pulmonary Embolism
Factoid 4711 - Created: 2003-04-02 18:41:59-05 - Modified: 2003-04-14 21:32:45-04
ACR Codes: 68.721
The diagnostic approach and treatment for pulmonary embolism continues to be an evolving and controversial area in medicine. Current recommendations are based on numerous studies, such as the PIOPED study. Imaging modalities vary and can be situation or institution dependent. The initial work-up for a pt suspected of having a pulmonary embolism involves a CXR in order to rule out other pulmonary or cardiac findings, such as a pneumothorax, pneumonia, or rib fracture. If the CXR is non diagnostic, other imaging modalities include V/Q scan, helical CT with PE protocol, pulmonary angiography, echocardiography, or venous US of the lower extremities. The gold standard is generally thought to be pulmonary angiography. There are advantages and disadvantages to each modality. CXR is rarely diagnostic of PE, nor does it often show the classic findings (Hampton’s hump, Westermark’s sign). However, it can be useful for ruling out other pathology. The most common findings on CXR in pt’s with PE include atelectasis, pleural effusions, infiltrates, and elevation of the hemidaphragm. V/Q scans also are rarely diagnostic. The scans can be difficult to interpret and often meaningless if there is other underlying pulmonary pathology. Additionally, the diagnosis of PE was highly dependent on the clinical suspicion of the physician. More recently, helical CT has been used to aid in diagnosing PE. Disadvantages include poor visualization of the periphery of the lungs at the subsegmental level. The main advantage is the relative ease of the procedure and the decreased variable of reader interpretation (when compared to V/Q scans). As previously stated, pulmonary angiography continues to be the gold standard for diagnosing pulmonary emboli. However, these studies are slightly more invasive than other modalities and can carry up to a 0.5% risk of mortality.
Reference(s):
Pulmonary Thromboembolism, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 14th edition, 1998, 1469-72. Plantz, Scott H., Emergency Medicine, Williams & Wilkins, 1998, 118-122.

UpToDate, ATS Guidelines: The diagnostic approach to acute venous thrombembolism
Display Images - || - Image Slide Sorter
Location:
Chest, Pulmonary (ex. Heart)
Sublocation:
none selected
Category:
Unsure
More Like This ? - Find Related Topics: Click on the Location, Sublocation, or Category Links Above
Send this Search to ... More Like This ?  - - CHORUS - - Google™
Written by: Michael P. Szczepanski, 2LT
Prepared by:
MS-4 USU Teaching File
Affiliation: Uniformed Services University - || - Author Profile
Approved by: David S. Feigin, M.D.
Affiliation: Johns Hopkins Hospitals - || - Editor Profile
-


Use this MedPix® Visitor Feedback Form for Comments and Suggestions


MedPix® is sponsored by the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, USUHS, Bethesda, MD
We do not accept paid advertisements.

This website is accredited by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. We comply with the HONcode standard
for trustworthy health information:
verify here.


Text and Images may be Copyrighted © 1999 - 2009 by the Original Content Contributors.
Copyrighted materials are reproduced here with their Permission.

MedPix® is a Registered Trademark of USUHS :: The MedPix® Database Engine is Patented - USPTO No. 7,080,098
Portions of MedPix® are Copyright © 1999 - 2009 by J.G. Smirniotopoulos, M.D. & H. Irvine, M.D.
The MedPix® Classification Schema Copyright © 1999 - 2009 by J.G.Smirniotopoulos,M.D.
MedPix® has displayed more than   266,868,734   pages since 3 September 2000.

Database Successfully Disconnected