MedPix® Patient Chart - Case No: 13751 :: Imaging - Review Images

Open-Close Option Buttons MedPix™ Display: Image (0)-Pt (13751)-Topic (9662)
| | | | | | | | | | | | :: Options-compass

History

Age: 1 :: Gender: boy

Patient History

This baby boy was brought to an outpatient office with a history of noisy breathing since birth. Symptoms have progressed over the last 4 months, with onset of continuous cough throughout the day. The patient has a previous ER visit for noted increased work of breathing, wheeze, cough and congestion. Patient’s grandmother feels that the child gags with solids.

Birth History: Full term, 40 weeks with no complications. Vaginal delivery, patient went home in 7 days after hospitalization in NICU.

Exam


Physical Exam and Laboratory

Lungs were clear to auscultation. Cardiac exam demonstrated regular rate and rhythm. Normal blood count.


Findings


Summary of Findings

• Chest x-ray – Bilateral hyperinflation of the lungs
• XR fluoro upper GI w/KUB – Well coordinated swallowing mechanism. No tracheal aspiration was observed. There is a posterior indentation on the esophagus possibly indicative of a vascular ring.
• CT chest w/o contrast – shows branching of the ascending and descending aorta


Diffferential


Differential Diagnosis

• Double aortic arch
• Right aortic arch
• Asthma
• RSV infection
• Subglottic stenosis
• Tracheomalacia


Diagnosis


Case Diagnosis

Dx: Double aortic arch


Dx Confirmed by: CT imaging w/contrast

Topic - Read



Dig Deeper - with MedPix™ Turbo Search

Followup


Followup and Treatment

No treatment is currently recommended. On 3D reconstruction, there appears to be no obstruction of the airways and the patient is minimally symptomatic. If the patient continues to have worsening symptoms you might consider a bronchoscopy to assess airway patency. You may also consider obtaining a FISH to look for a deletion on chromosome 22. However, this patient appears to have thymic tissue on CT, which tends to be absent in patients with the DiGeorge syndrome.

Discussion


Discussion for this Patient

Generally double aortic arch may be treated with surgical resection. However, surgery is not recommended in this patient because there appears to be no tracheal obstruction.


Read
Print this

Topic


Double Aortic Arch

Read

A double aortic arch is a vascular ring, a congenital malformation in which the trachea and the esophagus are surrounded by connecting segments of the aorta and its branches. Both a right and left sided aortic arch are present. During embryogenesis, the third, fourth and sixth pharyngeal arches become the primary contributors to the aortic arch. Normally, segments of the developing aortic arch regress, leading to a unilateral structure. A double aortic arch is formed when both fourth pharyngeal arches and dorsal aortas fail to regress. Both arches may remain patent, or one may be atretic. The right arch is more commonly superior than the left, and in 75% of patients, the right arch is dominant. The double aortic arch often occurs with other cardiovascular defects. These include ventricular septal defects and tetrology of Fallot. Truncus arteriosis, transposition of the great arteries and pulmonary atresia are also associated with double aortic arches. Congenital heart defects occur in 1 in 120 live births. Vascular rings account for less than 1% of congenital heart problems, and 45%-65% of patients undergoing surgical repair for a vascular ring have a double aortic arch.

DiGeorge Syndrome, a genetic disease caused by a deletion of chromosome band 22q11, has been associated a double aortic arch. Around 20% of patients with a double aortic arch will also have a deletion of 22q11. Close to 80% of DiGeorge syndrome patients have some form of cardiac defect; including VSD,Tetrology of Fallot, persistent truncus arteriosus and a double aortic arch. DiGeorge syndrome may also present with an absent thymus, palatal abnormalities, laryngotracheal defects, learning difficulties, renal anomalies, hearing loss and speech delays, seizures, hypocalcemia, T-cell mediated immunity and neurologic defects. The chromosomal association also extends to CATCH-22 syndrome. Due to the above relationships, patients with a double aortic arch may also present with any of the above. A double aortic arch may also be associated with esophageal atresia.

As a vascular ring, a double aortic arch may lead to compression of the trachea and esophagus, impairing respirations and causing difficulty swallowing. It has been estimated that double aortic arches make up about one percent of cardiovascular malformations. The incidence of a double aortic arch is unknown. Double aortic arches tend to present earlier than other vascular rings. Parents may notice noisy breathing and patients may experience an apparent life threatening event (ALTE). Patients may also experience choking, emesis or dysphagia. There are no clinical findings specific for a double aortic arch. Physicians may observe stridor that is worse with agitation and does not improve with nebulizer treatments.

A differential includes, but is not limited to: Asthma, RSV infection, subglottic stenosis, tracheomalacia and a right aortic arch.

Physicians should remember that the diagnosis of infection does not rule out a double aortic arch. Patients with recurrent respiratory symptoms may need further evaluation. In patients with a double arch, it may be worthwhile to obtain a FISH test to look for a deletion on chromosome 22, due to the association between DiGeorge syndrome and a double aortic arch.

Imaging on chest x-ray may indicate a vascular ring with lateral indentation of the trachea. If one is suspected, a physician can use echocardiography to reliably show a double aortic arch. MRI and CT are the best modalities to diagnose and characterize double aortic arches. They will demonstrate the location of the vessels along with any tracheal or esophageal obstruction. Cardiac catheterization, barium esophagography and EKG’s are not indicated for a double aortic arch.

Surgery is indicated to repair a double aortic arch in patients with symptoms of airway or esophageal obstruction and if patients are already undergoing surgical repair of associated anomalies.

REFs


References and Supporting Materials

- [PubMed] - [PubMed] - [PubMed] || - [PubMed] - [PubMed] - [PubMed] || || [ WEB ] - - [PubMed] - [PubMed] - [PubMed] - [PubMed] ||



:: PT: 13751 :: :: 6 questions

Print

print- Print Chart
History:
This baby boy was brought to an outpatient office with a history of noisy breathing since birth. Symptoms have progressed over the last 4 months, with onset of continuous cough throughout the day. The patient has a previous ER visit for noted increased work of breathing, wheeze, cough and congestion. Patient’s grandmother feels that the child gags with solids.

Birth History: Full term, 40 weeks with no complications. Vaginal delivery, patient went home in 7 days after hospitalization in NICU.

Exam:
Lungs were clear to auscultation. Cardiac exam demonstrated regular rate and rhythm. Normal blood count.

Findings:
• Chest x-ray – Bilateral hyperinflation of the lungs
• XR fluoro upper GI w/KUB – Well coordinated swallowing mechanism. No tracheal aspiration was observed. There is a posterior indentation on the esophagus possibly indicative of a vascular ring.
• CT chest w/o contrast – shows branching of the ascending and descending aorta

Differential:
• Double aortic arch
• Right aortic arch
• Asthma
• RSV infection
• Subglottic stenosis
• Tracheomalacia

Diagnosis:
Double aortic arch
Confirmed by:CT imaging w/contrast

Treatment and Followup:
No treatment is currently recommended. On 3D reconstruction, there appears to be no obstruction of the airways and the patient is minimally symptomatic. If the patient continues to have worsening symptoms you might consider a bronchoscopy to assess airway patency. You may also consider obtaining a FISH to look for a deletion on chromosome 22. However, this patient appears to have thymic tissue on CT, which tends to be absent in patients with the DiGeorge syndrome.

Discussion:
Generally double aortic arch may be treated with surgical resection. However, surgery is not recommended in this patient because there appears to be no tracheal obstruction.

Tools

User Tools
:: :: :: :: Email this Case - Share :: ::




End of Tools Tab Panel

Case Contributor and Editor
Topic Author: Ben Reed
Submitted by: Ben Reed - Author Info
Case/Image Editor: Dawn E Light - Editor Info
Case Accepted: 2010-09-27 17:23:01-04 :: Revised: :: Submitted:
COW: 618 :: CME Start: 20120228 :: CME End: 20110417 :: CME Review Due: 20150228

:: For Copyright Permissions, Please click

Data Channel Closed

cow_pt.html :: find me